Pupil Premium Strategy 2024/2025
- Pupil premium strategy statement
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium for the 2024 to 2025 academic year) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
- Academy overview
Detail | Data |
Academy name | Co-op Academy Clarice Cliff |
Number of pupils in academy | 394 |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils | 49.7% |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) | 2024/2025 |
Date this statement was published | 25th October 2024 |
Date on which it will be reviewed | October 2025 |
Statement authorised by | |
Pupil premium lead | Matthew Plant |
Governor / Trustee lead | Kim Clarkson |
Funding overview
Detail | Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year | £306,081.30 |
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) | £0 |
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year | £306,081.30 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
Statement of intent | |
At Co-op Academy Clarice Cliff, we acknowledge through our internal assessments and monitoring that a significant proportion of our pupils are identified as Pupil Premium and, therefore, may be termed “disadvantaged.” Our goal is to foster an inclusive culture with high expectations for all pupils, where pupil needs, not labels, drive our Pupil Premium strategy, with robust pastoral care at its core. We believe that “every interaction with disadvantaged pupils and their families has the power to bring about positive change.” It is our intention to ensure that all pupils, regardless of their background or the challenges they face, make good progress relative to their starting points. We understand the necessity of recognising and addressing the impact and challenges of socioeconomic disadvantage on learning. By addressing these gaps, we aim to lay a solid foundation for a comprehensive and effective support package. Our strategy emphasises early intervention, which is crucial for giving Pupil Premium pupils the best chance to thrive throughout their school journey. To ensure our Pupil Premium spending has the greatest impact, we adhere to these key principles: Building Belief: We foster a culture where:
Analysing Data: We make sure that:
Identification of Pupils: We ensure that:
Quality First Teaching: We ensure that:
Increasing Learning Time: We maximise the time each child has to "catch up" by:
Individualising Support: We make sure that:
The provisions considered by the Governors include:
|
Challenges
- This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number | Detail of challenge |
1 | Attendance data shows that non-Pupil Premium pupils consistently achieve higher attendance rates than Pupil Premium pupils as a group, although rates of attendance are improving over time for Pupil Premium pupils. By the end of the academic year, although Pupil Premium attendance reached 92.6%, non-Pupil Premium attendance remained significantly higher. Although persistent absence fell from 24.21% to 21.5%, Pupil Premium children continue to be overrepresented. |
2 | There have been improvements in end of year outcomes for Pupil Premium pupils over time. Despite this, there are attainment gaps to address. In Reading, 63% of pupil premium pupils achieved the expected standard at the end of Key Stage 1 compared to 67%. 14.8% achieved greater depth compared to 18.5%. This is below national standards. In writing, 52% achieved the expected standard compared to 57%. At Key Stage 2, in reading Pupil Premium attainment rose by 9% to 66%, narrowing the gap with all pupils (67%). However the percentage of pupils achieving greater depth was low overall for all pupils (9.1% and 10%). In Writing at Key Stage 2, attainment is broadly in line with other pupils. However the percentage achieving greater depth is half of other pupils (9% compared to 18%). |
3 | At the end of Key Stage 2, 58% of Pupil Premium pupils achieved the expected standard in mathematics. While there is no significant gap between pupil premium and other pupils, attainment overall is below national standards, indicating a need to ensure pupils have acquired the basic skills in maths needed to prepare them for the next stage in education. The percentage of pupils achieving greater depth in Key Stage 2 is also significantly below national for pupil premium and all pupils. This is not showing the accelerated progress that has been achieved in other areas. |
4 | There are low levels of language on entry to the academy as identified by baseline assessments and Well Comm assessments, which potentially hinders Pupil Premium pupils' progress across the curriculum. At the start of the year, 72.3% of these pupils in Nursery required intervention, while 75% in Reception initially needed support. This is supported by research into the language gaps that exist by the age of 5 between disadvantaged and other pupils. As pupils transition to Key Stage 2, language development challenges can impact overall achievement across the curriculum, particularly for mobile pupils as evidenced in writing attainment. |
5 | Pupil Premium pupils are over-represented in the number of behaviour incidents, which include low-level disruptions and suspensions. This is evidenced through week;y behaviour data analysis as well as end of year statistics. Comparisons indicate that these pupils account for 50% more overall incidents than their peers. |
6 | National statistics show that the academy is situated in an area of high deprivation, ranking in the bottom 2.5 of schools nationally. Analysis of barriers to attendance and engagement suggests that rising poverty levels in the local area potentially prevent some pupils thriving. This includes limited life experiences as well as academic opportunities. |
Intended outcomes
- This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome | Success criteria |
Good attendance secured for pupil premium pupils. | Attendance for pupil premium pupils will be 94%. Persistent absentee levels for pupil premium pupils will be 15%. Barriers to attendance will have been identified and clear strategies in place will evidence a positive impact. |
End of Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 attainment in writing and reading for all pupils, including PP pupils, will have increased to be broadly in line with national averages. | Attainment in writing at the end of KS1 for pupil premium pupils will be at least 60% expected and 10% greater depth. Attainment in writing at the end of KS2 for pupil premium pupils will continue to be in line with non pupil premium. Attainment in reading at the end of KS1 for all pupils will be at least 68% expected for pupil premium pupils and 18% greater depth. Attainment in reading at the end of KS2 for all pupils, including pupil premium, will be 70% expected and 20% greater depth. |
End of Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 attainment in maths for all pupils, including Pupil Premium pupils, will increase to be broadly in line with national averages. | Attainment in maths at the end of Key Stage 1 for all pupils will be 75%, with Pupil Premium pupils achieving at least 68% expected and 18% greater depth. Attainment in maths at the end of Key Stage 2 for all pupils will be 75%, with Pupil Premium pupils achieving at least 70% with at least 15% greater depth. |
Pupils will be able to articulate what they know, understand and can do effectively. Language will not be a barrier to learning. | WellComm assessments will demonstrate excellent progress for all pupils in Nursery, Reception, and Key Stage 2 from baseline to end-of-year outcomes. By the end of the year, 90% of Nursery pupils will be at age-related expectations on the WellComm assessments, as will 90% of Reception pupils. Pupils in Key Stage 2 requiring Well Comm intervention will make strong progress from their initial baseline, with at least 90% of pupils no longer requiring intervention. |
Reduction in the amount of behaviour incidents overall, including for Pupil Premium pupils. Reduction in the amount of fixed term suspensions. | Incidents of low level behaviour will show a reduction per term overall and particularly for PP pupils from the previous year. The number of suspensions will decrease. Where suspensions do occur, a comprehensive support plan will show improvements for individual pupils over time. |
All pupils will have access to a wide range of experiences including extra curricular clubs and trips which significantly enhance their wellbeing and attendance. | Analysis of trips and clubs will show that these are well attended by all pupils throughout the year and that pupil premium pupils are accessing a wide range of experiences. Pupil premium pupils will have accessed a wide range of experiences in addition to extra-curricular clubs across all year groups. |
Activity in this academic year
- This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost | £167657 |
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
English Professional development for all staff aligned with the whole-school writing cycle. Implementation of the new spelling scheme to meet pupils' needs. Professional development focused on adaptive teaching strategies. Review of adaptive teaching strategies. Professional development for the implementation of the new handwriting scheme. | The guidance emphasises:
The guidance suggests:
Ronald Kellogg, an American literacy expert, argues that writing can be as cognitively demanding as chess. It is demanding because children need to coordinate several different processes. For instance, children need to work out what they want to communicate and how, handwrite or type accurately, regulate their own thoughts and behaviour, and monitor their work. Pupils will need extensive instruction, practice, and feedback to become skilled at coordinating these aspects of writing. To develop pupils’ ability to write at greater length, it can be helpful to think of writing as a task made up of five stages: planning, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing. Children can be taught, through modelling and scaffolding, strategies which support them to undertake each of these stages of the writing process. The report goes on to suggest that teachers should: Consider the types of spelling errors pupils are making to identify appropriate strategies for improving pupils’ spelling. Explicitly teach spellings and provide pupils with extensive opportunities to practise them. Pupils should also practise sentence combining and other sentence construction techniques | 2, 3 |
Pupil voice surveys of marking and feedback. Staff survey of marking and feedback. New feedback policy to be embedded and sustained. Professional development to be delivered around Rosenshine strategies. | EEF +6 months Very high impact for very low cost based on extensive evidence. Providing feedback is a well-evidenced approach and has a high impact on learning outcomes. Feedback can be effective during, immediately after and some time after learning. Studies have shown positive effects of feedback from teachers and peers. Studies of verbal feedback show slightly higher impacts overall (+7 months). Rosenshine’s Principles combines three distinct research areas (cognitive science, classroom practices, cognitive support) and how they complement each other by addressing how:
| 2, 3 |
Professional development for all staff focused on strategies to improve reading attainment across KS1 and KS2. Monitoring and assessment practices refined to track progress in reading. Professional development on adaptive teaching strategies to ensure reading instruction meets the diverse needs of all pupils, including those eligible for Pupil Premium. Curriculum review and enhancement of the reading program to ensure it is aligned with national standards and supports all pupils in reaching expected levels. | Reading comprehension strategies are techniques that help students understand text better. Key points from the EEF include:
| 2, 4 |
Professional development for all staff focused on strategies to enhance maths attainment across KS1 and KS2, with a specific focus on closing the gap for Pupil Premium pupils. Monitoring and assessment practices refined to track progress in maths. Professional development on adaptive teaching strategies to ensure maths instruction meets the diverse needs of all pupils, with particular focus on Pupil Premium pupils. Curriculum review and enhancement of the maths program to ensure it aligns with national standards and supports all pupils, including Pupil Premium pupils, in reaching the expected levels. |
As stated by the EEF:"Early mathematics is not just about numbers; it encompasses a range of skills and concepts that are essential for later success in learning." | 3 |
Provide Professional development and refresher training for EYFS and KS1 staff on WellComm. EYFS leaders to monitor and review the quality of WellComm provision regularly. Expand Wellcomm to KS2 following successes in EYFS Analyse WellComm assessment data termly to identify and address support needs. Facilitate staff meetings to share strategies and address challenges. Ensure WellComm strategies are integrated into the EYFS, KS1 and KS2 curriculums. | Oral language interventions | EEF "Developing children's spoken language skills is a crucial foundation for their learning across the curriculum, impacting their overall educational outcomes." (EEF) Very high impact for very low cost based on extensive evidence. Training can support adults to ensure they model and develop pupils’ oral language skills and vocabulary development. Some studies also often report improved classroom climate and fewer behaviour issues following work on oral language. | 4 |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost | £56416 |
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Reading interventions to be delivered in Y6 by the STLPs and TLAs based on regular assessments. Targeted interventions to ensure more pupils reach greater depth in reading. | EEF +4 - small group tuition Small group tuition is defined as one educator working with 2-5 pupils together in a group. This arrangement enables the teacher to focus exclusively on a small number of learners, usually in a separate classroom or working area. It is most likely to be effective if it is targeted at pupils’ specific needs. Diagnostic assessment can be used to assess the best way to target support. | 2 |
All pupils across KS2 who are new to the school to complete phonics assessments on entry. Rapid Catch Up phonics intervention to be delivered daily to identified pupils. Assessments to be completed half-termly. Little Wandle SEND programme to be implemented for KS2 SEND pupils. | EEF +5 - Phonics High impact for very low cost based on substantial evidence. Phonics is an important component in the development of early reading skills, particularly for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. Targeted phonics interventions have been shown to be more effective when delivered as regular sessions over a period up to 12 weeks. | 2, 4 |
All staff to be trained in delivering WellComm interventions. WellComm interventions to be delivered regularly based on WellComm assessments across EYFS. WellComm approaches to continue to be integrated in EYFS provision. WellComm to be introduced into Key Stage 2. Baseline assessments to be introduced for all new pupils to the academy. | EEF +6 - Oral Language interventions Very high impact for very low cost. Oral language interventions (also known as oracy or speaking and listening interventions) refer to approaches that emphasise the importance of spoken language and verbal interaction in the classroom. Oral language interventions are based on the idea that comprehension and reading skills benefit from explicit discussion of either content or processes of learning, or both, oral language interventions aim to support learners’ use of vocabulary, articulation of ideas and spoken expression. The EEF identifies that programmes delivered one to one have a higher impact. Therefore, for pupils identified with a speech and language difficulty, one to one intervention will also be provided over a sustained period. EEF toolkit oral language interventions | 4 |
Implementation of targeted interventions to support Pupil Premium pupils in maths by STLPs and TLAs. Review of maths teaching approach to ensure high quality reasoning activities. Review approach to calculations to ensure pupils secure basic number skills. Targeted interventions to ensure more pupils reach greater depth in maths. In class intervention (same day) to close gaps as they become apparent. SATs booster groups to target specific gaps in children’s knowledge. | Small group interventions are highlighted in the EEF Guidance Report on Improving Mathematics in Key Stages 2 and 3 as a powerful approach to enhancing student learning. These interventions enable teachers to tailor their instruction to meet individual needs, fostering a collaborative environment where students can actively engage with mathematical concepts. The report states, "Small group interventions can be particularly effective in supporting students' understanding and retention of key mathematical skills." This effectiveness is attributed to several factors: targeted instruction allows for immediate feedback, encourages participation and discussion among peers, and creates opportunities for deeper exploration of content. By focusing on the specific challenges students face, small group interventions not only improve understanding but also build confidence in their mathematical abilities. | 3 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost | £46870 |
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Behaviour lead to complete regular analysis of behaviour data and make adaptations as appropriate. Behaviour lead to engage with parents to support improvements in behaviour including sharing of the expectations. Range of strategies in place to support behaviour and wellbeing throughout the academy. Regular CPD for all staff on the behaviour policy and strategies. Review of lunchtime provision to ensure the behaviour policy is consistent during unstructured times. | EEF +4 months Moderate impact for low cost based on limited evidence. The EEF references that both targeted interventions and universal approaches have positive overall effects (+ 4 months). The appropriate combination of behaviour approaches to reduce overall disruption and provide tailored support where required. | 5 |
Action plan for attendance linked to identified barriers. Review of the attendance policy. Staff ambassadors to support the attendance team. Family Support Assistant to be an integral part of the attendance team to support individual pupils and families to overcome barriers to attendance. Early Help support to continue to be offered as a supportive message to overcome attendance barriers. Bespoke attendance rewards and incentives to encourage pupils to attend school regularly. | The DfE guidance has been informed by engagement with schools that have significantly reduced levels of absence and persistent absence. Working together to improve school attendance “Listening to and learning from parents in the attendance crisis” - September 2023 Listening to, and learning from, parents in the attendance crisis | 1, 6 |
A wide range of extra curricular activities will be available throughout the year including participation in the arts, physical activities and outdoor activities. The extra-curricular leader will regularly monitor participation in these activities for all pupils and share findings with SLT. Strategies will be put in place to ensure participation in a broad range of activities. | EEF guidance - Arts Participation - +3 Moderate impact for very low cost. Arts participation approaches can have a positive impact on academic outcomes in other areas of the curriculum. Improved outcomes have been identified in English, Mathematics and Science. Benefits have been found in both primary and secondary schools. Some arts activities have been linked with improvements in specific outcomes. For example, there is some evidence of the impact of drama on writing and potential link between music and spatial awareness. EEF guidance - Outdoor adventure learning Outdoor Adventure Learning might provide opportunities for disadvantaged pupils to participate in activities that they otherwise might not be able to access. Through participation in these challenging physical and emotional activities, outdoor adventure learning interventions can support pupils to develop non-cognitive skills such as resilience, self-confidence and motivation. The application of these non-cognitive skills in the classroom may in turn have a positive effect on academic outcomes. EEF guidance - Physical Activity - +1 Low impact for very low cost Participating in sports and physical activity is likely to have wider health and social benefits. There are wider benefits from regular physical activity in terms of physical development, health and wellbeing as well as other potential benefits have been reported such as improved attendance. | 1, 5, 6 |
Total budgeted cost
Total budgeted cost | £270943 |
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
- This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2023 to 2024 academic year.
Pupil premium strategy outcomes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attendance By the end of the academic year, Pupil Premium (PP) attendance reached 92.6% (from 89.99% in the previous year), with Persistent Absenteeism (PA) decreasing to 21.3% from 24.86% last year. An impact analysis highlighted that a child-centred and family-centred approach is more effective than traditional methods like the Education Welfare Service. This insight will guide the upcoming strategy to offer more personalised support for improving attendance. Weekly attendance meetings with the Head of School and Attendance Team address concerns and determine next steps. Actions include sending first concern letters, requesting medical evidence, and issuing Penalty Notice Letters (PNWL) or fines for persistent issues. Punctuality is monitored with ‘late gates,’ and significant punctuality concerns are addressed by offering places in the free 2 Track Breakfast Provision. Children arriving after register closure receive an acceptable ‘U’ mark. Attendance clinics and interventions involve face-to-face meetings, telephone calls, and Dojo messages. PA children are supported with attendance charts, incentives, and weekly Dojo updates. Evidence is gathered for PNWL and holiday fines, and individual pupil caseloads are tracked. Engagement strategies include ‘Be in to be in with a chance to win!’ spot prizes, attendance bears for top-attending classes, and termly prize draws for students with 96% attendance and no late marks. Monitoring is integrated into early help and Child Protection plans. Ensuring continued improvement in attendance for Pupil Premium children and those who are persistently absent remains a priority, requiring sustained focus and strategic support. Writing Outcomes
Attainment for Pupil Premium pupils in writing has reached 79% at the end of KS2, slightly higher than the 74% achieved by non-Pupil Premium pupils. This outcome reflects the success of targeted support and interventions for Pupil Premium pupils, contributing to strong writing performance across the board. Continued focus on effective strategies will be important to sustain and further enhance writing outcomes for all pupils.
Overall, the data indicates that while there is some success, particularly in Year 4, writing remains an area of concern, especially in Year 5. The need for focused interventions to support Pupil Premium pupils in writing is evident across all year groups. The Key Stage 1 writing data, with 42.9% of Pupil Premium pupils achieving the expected standard in Year 1 and 51.9% in Year 2, provides important context for understanding the Key Stage 2 data. Impact on Key Stage 2 Data:
The Key Stage 1 data highlights the need for early and consistent intervention in writing for Pupil Premium pupils. Addressing these gaps sooner will lead to improved outcomes in Key Stage 2, helping to prevent the lower attainment levels observed in some year groups. Reading Outcomes
Attainment for Pupil Premium pupils has increased by 9% from the previous year, reaching 66% at the end of KS2. This improvement has narrowed the attainment gap, bringing Pupil Premium pupils closer to the attainment level of non-Pupil Premium pupils, who achieved 67% this year. Additionally, 9% of Pupil Premium pupils achieved greater depth, showing encouraging signs of higher-level attainment. With continued targeted support, this percentage will rise in future years. While there remains a slight gap, the progress reflects a positive trend. Phonics Performance:
Interpretation:
Reading Attainment in Key Stage 1:
Interpretation: Reading attainment has demonstrated a positive improvement from Year 1 to Year 2, rising from 60.7% to 63% of pupil premium pupils reaching the expected standard. While there are still challenges for some Pupil Premium pupils when compared to all pupils, this upward trend in performance highlights a solid foundation for continued growth in reading skills. Reading Attainment in Key Stage 2:
Interpretation:
Overall Conclusion:
Language as a Barrier to Learning Nursery: Initially, 72.3% of Pupil Premium pupils required intervention. By the end of the year, 88.9% of these pupils are now at age-related expectations, reflecting a substantial improvement (+61.2%). Reception: Similarly, 75% of Pupil Premium pupils initially needed intervention, but by year-end, 93.8% are at age-related expectations, marking a significant increase (+68.8%). Closing the Gap:
Overall Impact:
Conclusion:The interventions in Nursery and Reception have had a profound positive impact, particularly for Pupil Premium pupils, significantly increasing the number of pupils at age-related expectations and enhancing their confidence and engagement across the curriculum. Continued focus on language development will be key to sustaining this progress. As a result, we will be extending these interventions into KS2, particularly due to the high mobility of pupils, many of whom may not have developed the appropriate language skills needed for their stage of learning. This will ensure ongoing support and will help to bridge any gaps in language development. Behaviour Reduction in Behaviour Incidents: Significant progress has been made in reducing behaviour incidents involving Pupil Premium (PP) pupils. By the summer term, PP pupils represented 48% to 53% of those receiving low-level sanctions, reflecting a positive improvement compared to previous terms. This demonstrates ongoing efforts are having an impact. Low-Level Incidents: While Pupil Premium pupils continue to be over-represented, the proportion is lower when compared to previous terms. Termly Reduction in Incidents: There has been noticeable improvement, with data reflecting some fluctuations. The increase in incidents during the summer term can be attributed to enhanced monitoring and compliance checks, which are helping to identify and address issues more effectively. This proactive approach is contributing to a reduction in overall incidents. Impact of Interventions:
Data Analysis Insights:
Behaviour Contracts:
Professional Development:
Strategic Planning:
Long-Term Goals:
Interventions and policy revisions have successfully reduced behaviour incidents and lowered the representation of Pupil Premium pupils in more significant sanctions. While some challenges persist with low-level behaviour, our ongoing focus on data accuracy, early intervention, and targeted support for Pupil Premium pupils, alongside improved family engagement and staff development, will drive continued positive progress and lasting improvements. Engagement/ Extra- Curricular Activities The data outlines the participation of Pupil Premium and non-Pupil Premium pupils in extracurricular activities over the Autumn and Spring Terms of 2023-2024, along with proposed next steps to improve equity in access to these activities. Analysis of Current Data
Challenges Identified
Next Steps and RecommendationsThe suggested next steps aim to close the participation gap and ensure a more equitable distribution of opportunities:
The data highlights promising successes in engaging Pupil Premium pupils in extracurricular activities, with several provisions showing increased participation. While there are still areas for improvement, the proposed next steps will address these gaps, ensuring that all pupils, regardless of socio-economic background, can fully access and benefit from enriching extracurricular experiences. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Externally provided programmes
Programme | Provider |
Vici coaching - The Still Method | Vici Tuition |
Relationships without Fear | GLOW |
Pupil Premium Strategy Statement |